Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society

Year 2021, Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 31-37

https://doi.org/10.26715/jbms.33_2020_1_7

Case Report

Natal and Neonatal Teeth in Bahrain: A Review of 19 Cases

Fajer S. Al-Buainain1*, Aania Adil2, Omar Mustafa3

Author Affiliation

1Resident, Dental and maxillofacial center, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Bahrain

2Senior Resident, Dental, and maxillofacial center, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Bahrain

3Consultant Paediatric Dentist, Dental and maxillofacial center, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Bahrain

*Corresponding author: Fajer Salem Al-Buainain, Resident, Dental and maxillofacial center, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Bahrain. Tel.: (+973) 34455459. Address: Kingdom of Bahrain, West Riffa, Block 91-, Road: 1066, House: 3098; E-mail: Fajer.s.albuainain@gmail.com 

Received date: September 30, 2020; Accepted date: December 9, 2020; Published date: March 31, 2021


Abstract

Background: This paper aimed to present 29 natal/neonatal teeth in 19 patients and subsequently described clinical characteristics, associated disorders, and treatments.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of Bahraini neonates with natal or neonatal teeth who reported to the pediatric dental clinic, Dental and Maxillofacial Center, Bahrain Defense Forces-Royal Medical Services, Kingdom of Bahrain, conducted over a decade. Information about age, gender, mothers’ chief complaint, the clinical appearance of natal/neonatal teeth, location, associated complications, and treatments were collected.

Results: A total of 29 teeth (20 natal, 9 neonatal) were diagnosed in 19 infants. There was a female predilection (14 females, 4 males). Twenty-eight of the natal/neonatal teeth were located in the lower central incisor area and one tooth in the lower lateral incisor area. Almost half of the infants (n=9, 47.4%) were diagnosed with a pair of teeth, and only one infant was distinguished with a total of three natal/ neonatal teeth. Three cases were associated with Riga-Fede disease, five with gingival hyperplasia, and one with enamel hypoplasia. Intraoral radiographs were taken selectively for some of the patients. Extraction was the most common treatment choice.

Conclusion: The occurrence of a natal/neonatal tooth is considered a rare phenomenon. It showed diverse clinical characteristics which could lead to various complications. In this study, natal teeth were more common than neonatal teeth, with a preference for females. The decision to retain or extract a natal/ neonatal tooth should be evaluated in each case, keeping in mind multiple factors like scientific evidence-based knowledge, clinical judgment, and parental opinion.

Keywords: Dental Enamel Hypoplasia; Gingival Hyperplasia; Oral Ulcer; Natal teeth; Vitamin K.